Controversial blogger and political commentator Robert Alai has sparked fresh debate within the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) after publicly telling Winnie Odinga to leave the party if she is unhappy with its direction.
In remarks shared on social media, Alai argued that ODM members who openly oppose the party’s current stance should consider exiting instead of fighting the leadership from within. He singled out Winnie Odinga, saying that persistent public criticism of ODM decisions undermines party unity and discipline.
Alai maintained that ODM, like any political party, has established structures for handling internal disagreements and that airing disputes publicly weakens its bargaining power and credibility. According to him, loyalty to collective decisions is essential, especially at a time when the party is navigating complex political realignments.
His comments come amid growing internal discussions within ODM over its future political strategy, including its relationship with the ruling administration and the broader direction of the opposition. These debates have exposed generational and ideological differences, with younger leaders and supporters pushing for reforms while others urge cohesion and restraint.
Winnie Odinga’s supporters have pushed back against Alai’s remarks, insisting that expressing dissent should not be equated to disloyalty. They argue that open debate has historically been part of ODM’s identity and has helped shape its democratic credentials.
While ODM’s top leadership has not officially commented on Alai’s statements, the exchange has reignited conversations about freedom of expression, internal democracy, and party loyalty. Political observers say how ODM manages such disagreements could significantly influence its unity and public image ahead of future political contests.
